Skip to main content

State v. Ali

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 3864

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion or deprive Ali of due process in permitting victim impact statements during the sentencing hearing under R.C. 2930.14(B), the trial court did not plainly err in imposing a prison term rather than community control for fifth-degree felony receiving stolen property, the trial court did not plainly err in imposing consecutive sentences, and Ali did not receive the ineffective assistance of counsel.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • victim impact statement alleged defendant “whipped” his child

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Luper Schuster

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.