Khan v. Yale University
Citations
- 347 Conn. 1
Syllabus
The plaintiff, who was an undergraduate student at Yale College, sought to recover damages in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut in connection with statements the defendant D, a classmate of the plaintiff, made during a disciplinary hearing conducted by the named defendant university's committee on sexual misconduct (commit- tee). In 2015, D accused the plaintiff of sexually assaulting her in her dormitory, and the university suspended the plaintiff. The committee, however, stayed the disciplinary proceedings against the plaintiff pend- ing the outcome of a criminal case that the state had filed against him. The plaintiff subsequently was acquitted on multiple counts of sexual assault, and, in 2018, he resumed full-time student status at Yale. Shortly thereafter, however, as a result of the reporting in a student newspaper of additional allegations of sexual assault involving the plaintiff, the plaintiff agreed to undergo a mental health consultation, but he refused a request that he meet with university administrators. Subsequently, the university again suspended the plaintiff on the ground that it was necessary for the safety and well-being of the plaintiff and the university community. Thereafter, the committee convened a hearing in connection with D's 2015 sexual assault complaint. At the hearing, D, who had since graduated, provided a statement via teleconference, but she did not testify under oath or provide any sworn statement. The plaintiff and his counsel were not permitted in the hearing room when the hearing panel questioned D and, instead, listened to an audio feed from an anteroom. The plaintiff's counsel was not permitted to speak, question D or any 1 2 JUNE, 2023 347 Conn. 1 Khan v. Yale University other witness, or raise objections, and the hearing panel denied the plaintiff's request for a recording or transcript of the hearing. Addition- ally, the committee's procedures allowed the parties to submit questions that they
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ‘‘doctrine of absolute . . . immunity . . . shields judges, parties, and witnesses from liability for their testimony in judicial and quasi- judicial proceedings’’
- “[the plaintiff] faced trial before a jury in early 2018 for first, second, third, and [fourth degree] sexual assault during a nearly [two week] trial and was acquitted on all counts after less than [one] day of deliberations” (internal quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robinson; McDonald; D’Auria; Mullins; Ecker; Alexander; Keller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Deutsche Bank AG v. VikSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2024-05-28· cited 12×
- 7 Germantown Road, LLC v. DanburySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-01-28· cited 5×
- In re Jewelyette M.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-03-21· cited 1×
- Jamie G. v. Dept. of Children & FamiliesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-08-05· cited 1×
- State v. MahargSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-07-08
- Khan v. Jewish Women InternationalConnecticut Appellate Court· 2026-06-30
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court· 1983-03-07· cited 2,053×
- Littlejohn v. City of New YorkSecond Circuit· 2015-08-03· cited 1,766×
- Leonard F. v. Israel Discount Bank of New York, and the Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanySecond Circuit· 1999-12-08· cited 746×
- Petyan v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-06-17· cited 552×
- DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-08-20· cited 503×
- John Doe v. University of the SciencesThird Circuit· 2020-05-29· cited 295×
- John Doe v. David BaumSixth Circuit· 2018-09-07· cited 247×
- Kelley v. BonneySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-04-07· cited 204×
- Kirch v. Liberty Media Corp.Second Circuit· 2006-06-05· cited 192×
- Post v. MendelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-03-27· cited 105×
- Bleich v. OrtizSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-06-18· cited 90×
- Felder v. USTASecond Circuit· 2022-03-07· cited 77×
- Beverly Enterprises, Inc. Donald L. Dotson v. Rosemary Trump Service Employees International Union Local 585Third Circuit· 1999-07-08· cited 75×
- State v. AliSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-06-06· cited 72×
- Rioux v. BarrySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-07-31· cited 71×
- Hopkins v. O'CONNORSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-07-03· cited 70×
- Craig v. Stafford Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-09-14· cited 70×
- Doe v. Salisbury UniversityD. Maryland· 2015-08-21· cited 70×
- Gambardella v. Apple Health Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-05-19· cited 48×
- Pagano v. IppolitiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-07-28· cited 42×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.