Ohio Court of Appeals· 2/9/2024

State v. Ali

Citations

2024 Ohio 486

Syllabus

Per Sulek, P.J., where the trial court fails to address discretionary costs, including costs of confinement, at the sentencing hearing, but imposes those costs in the sentencing entry, the imposition of confinement costs is contrary to law.

Judges: Sulek

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. McClain
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-02-21· cited 7×
State v. Patterson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-06-07· cited 5×
State v. Sutton
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-05-31· cited 1×
State v. Brazzel
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-07-19
State v. Richardson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-07-26
State v. Biehler
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-02-06

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Wymer
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-04-26· cited 26×
State v. Velesquez
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-31· cited 15×
State v. Hill
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-03-31· cited 10×
State v. Eaton
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-06-05· cited 9×
State v. Temple
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-30· cited 7×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.