· 1/12/2017
Spring v. Bradford
Citations
- 241 Ariz. 455
- 388 P.3d 849
- 756 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 40
- 2017 Ariz. App. LEXIS 11
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- considering whether “further discovery would likely yield any fact essential to [the nonmoving party’s] opposition to the [summary judgment] motion”
- considering whether “further discovery would likely yield any fact essential to [the nonmoving party’s] opposition to the [summary judgment] motion”
- considering whether “further discovery would likely yield any fact essential to [the nonmoving party’s] opposition to the [summary judgment] motion”
- considering whether “further discovery would likely yield any fact essential to [the nonmoving party’s] opposition to the [summary judgment] motion”
- considering whether “further discovery would likely yield any fact essential to [the nonmoving party’s] opposition to the [summary judgment] motion”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cattani, Winthrop, Portley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.