Leavy v. Parsell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting “one of the improper remarks was directly relevant to the issue of witness credibility, the essential issue in this case of diametrically conflicting stories”
• prejudice presumed when lawyer deliberately raised “seatbelt defense” and improperly commented on credibility of witness in violation of court order
• misconduct includes counsel improperly vouching for witness’s credibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).