Sandretto v. Payson Healthcare Management, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the weight given to expert testimony is within the sole province of the fact finder
• explaining that deposition testimony may be considered an amendment to prior disclosures
• rejecting challenge to denial of motion to continue because appellant failed to show that a continuance would have enabled it to present additional evidence or argument
• explaining challenges to expert testimony “based on isolated portions” of the expert’s opinion “does not present a Rule 702 argument; rather, it is a jury argument going to the weight and credibility of the testimony”
• appellate court reviews superior court’s decision to approve a settlement agreement for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).