Skip to main content
· 7/23/1981

Gene Miller v. Universal City Studios, Inc.

Citations

  • 650 F.2d 1365
  • 212 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 345
  • 7 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1785
  • 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 11135

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Rule 615 prohibits the read- ing of trial transcripts
  • noting that exempting the defendant’s expert from sequestration under Rule 615 “would be questionable” in a copyright infringement case where the expert would be analyzing the similarity of two works after the plaintiff analyzed the same two works
  • affirming exclusion of witness as remedy for \a clear and intentional\ violation of a sequestration order
  • “The valuable distinction in copyright law between facts and the expression of facts cannot be maintained if research is held to be copyrightable.”
  • “The opportunity to shape testimony is as great with a witness who reads trial testimony as with one who hears the testimony in open court.''
  • “Whether or not it would be reasonable for a trial court to exempt an expert witness from a sequestration order, there is no required exemption implied under rule 615.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roney, Hill, Kravitch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.