Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 9/29/1988
Sonder v. Sonder
Citations
- 549 A.2d 155
- 378 Pa. Super. 474
- 1988 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2898
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- pension and profit-sharing plans are gamishable for the purpose of fulfilling the husband’s support obligations under a consent decree
- Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by Wieand, J.
- en banc, four separate opinions
- en banc, four separate opinions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cirillo, Cavanaugh, Rowley, Wieand, McEwen, Olszewski, Beck, Tamilia, Popovich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- McMahon v. McMahonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-07-24· cited 99×
- Rhoades v. PryceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-04-28· cited 91×
- Grand Entertainment Group, Ltd. v. Star Media Sales, Inc.Third Circuit· 1993-03-19· cited 71×
- Sinaiko v. SinaikoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-08-24· cited 60×
- Nicholson v. CombsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-11-14· cited 51×
- Kenis v. Perini Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-09-18· cited 49×
- Knorr v. KnorrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-04-04· cited 45×
- King v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-04-05· cited 41×
- D'Huy v. D'HuySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-01-23· cited 39×
- Frank v. FrankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-03-07· cited 38×
- Glynn v. GlynnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-12-17· cited 37×
- Foulk v. FoulkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-12-17· cited 36×
- Lyons v. LyonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-01-17· cited 34×
- Cunningham, B. v. Cunningham, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-03-20· cited 29×
- McFadden v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-08-02· cited 25×
- K.M.G. v. H.M.W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-09-29· cited 25×
- Lipschutz v. LipschutzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-01-19· cited 24×
- DeMatteis v. DeMatteisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-11-15· cited 24×
- In re T.J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-08-19· cited 22×
- Miller v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-02-19· cited 21×
Cites
73 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court· 1949-06-20· cited 10,863×
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court· 1975-06-09· cited 3,396×
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1966-06-06· cited 1,344×
- Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court· 1988-04-27· cited 861×
- United States v. RylanderSupreme Court· 1983-04-19· cited 677×
- Maggio v. ZeitzSupreme Court· 1948-02-09· cited 646×
- Steuart v. McChesneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-04-30· cited 419×
- Michaelson v. United States Ex Rel. Chicago, St. P., M. & OR Co.Supreme Court· 1924-10-20· cited 306×
- Feingold v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-11-18· cited 253×
- Oriel v. RussellSupreme Court· 1929-01-14· cited 246×
- In Re MartoranoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-10-03· cited 148×
- Barrett v. BarrettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-01-28· cited 126×
- Presbytery of Beaver-Butler v. Middlesex Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-04-03· cited 95×
- Commonwealth v. MarconeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-02-01· cited 87×
- Brown v. HallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-10-05· cited 83×
- Janet D. v. CarrosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-03-29· cited 73×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Magaziner v. MagazinerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1969-04-23· cited 69×
- Riccobene AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-07-13· cited 58×
- Amoco Oil Co. v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-06-28· cited 55×
- McManus v. Chubb Group of InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-03-29· cited 50×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.