McFadden v. McFadden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court abused its discretion by not considering party’s changed financial circumstances brought about by voluntary retirement
• “Pennsylvania case law clearly establishes that retirement can serve as a basis for the changed circumstances of a substantial and continuing nature necessary to modify an alimony award.”
• husband’sknowl-edge at time of divorce of voluntary retirement almost five years in future did not automatically preclude his seeking modification of alimony payment order at time of retirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bogan v. Bogan
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2001-11-08· cited 819×
• Steneken v. Steneken
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2004-03-15· cited 59×
• Silvan v. Sylvan
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1993-10-06· cited 20×
• Dorr v. Newman
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1990-01-26· cited 19×
• Edelstein v. Edelstein
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-10-26· cited 19×
• Foley v. Foley
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-02-26· cited 18×
• Dilger v. Dilger
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1990-02-23· cited 7×
• Crocker-Fasulo, S. v. Fasulo, G.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-03-31· cited 7×
• Fuller v. Fuller
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-01-25· cited 4×
• Speaker, M. v. Speaker, P.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-03-16· cited 2×
• Richard Thomas Bogan v. Doris Mae Bogan
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1999-11-02
• Colella v. Colella
  Armstrong County Court of Common Pleas· 2005-03-30

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sonder v. Sonder
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-09-29· cited 126×
• Braderman v. Braderman
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-02-08· cited 90×
• King v. King
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-08-24· cited 72×
• Flynn v. Flynn
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-03-29· cited 60×
• Equitable Gas Co. v. City of Pittsburgh
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-02-21· cited 58×
• Hollman v. Hollman
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-11-01· cited 36×
• Commonwealth Ex Rel. Scanlon v. Scanlon
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-02-18· cited 32×
• Geyer v. Geyer
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-02-18· cited 26×
• Commonwealth Ex Rel. Ross v. Ross
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1965-09-16· cited 26×
• Pacella v. Pacella
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-04-26· cited 26×
• Lee v. Lee
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-04-07· cited 20×
• Commonwealth ex rel. Burns v. Burns
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-12-11· cited 19×
• Teribery v. Teribery
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-09-19· cited 15×
• Mazzei v. Mazzei
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-07-06· cited 14×
• Stanley v. Stanley
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-02-15· cited 9×
• Factor v. Factor
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-08-24· cited 2×