Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1/23/1990
D'Huy v. D'Huy
Citations
- 568 A.2d 1289
- 390 Pa. Super. 509
- 1990 Pa. Super. LEXIS 80
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- refusal by the en banc court majority to reach applicability of Act No. 13, in spite of special scheduling and briefing for just that purpose
- refusal by the en banc court majority to reach applicability of Act No. 18, in spite of special scheduling and briefing for just that purpose
- where the court rejected the concept that incorporation automatically meant merger but instead was governed by the intent of the parties
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cirillo, Cavanaugh, Brosky, Rowley, Montemuro, Beck, Tamilia, Popovich, Johnson, Johnson'S
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Krizovensky v. KrizovenskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-05-04· cited 110×
- McMahon v. McMahonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-07-24· cited 99×
- Samuel Rappaport Family Partnership v. Meridian BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-04-11· cited 62×
- Frank v. FrankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-03-07· cited 38×
- Pauling v. PaulingWyoming Supreme Court· 1992-08-20· cited 27×
- DeMatteis v. DeMatteisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-11-15· cited 24×
- Bell v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-01-22· cited 19×
- Sorace v. SoraceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-02-14· cited 17×
- Ashbaugh v. AshbaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-07-08· cited 17×
- Ballestrino v. BallestrinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-12-06· cited 16×
- Woodings v. WoodingsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-01-07· cited 15×
- In Re Chateaugay Corp.S.D. New York· 1990-07-11· cited 13×
- Flick v. FlickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-08-28· cited 12×
- Peck v. PeckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-03-06· cited 11×
- Jones v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-12-08· cited 9×
- LTV Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.S.D. New York· 1990-07-11· cited 8×
- Lower v. LowerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-06-07· cited 7×
- Soll v. SollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-10-29· cited 7×
- Matlock v. MatlockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-07-21· cited 6×
- Uhler v. UhlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-07-23· cited 3×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Sonder v. SonderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-09-29· cited 126×
- Brown v. HallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-10-05· cited 83×
- In Re Estate of BreyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-10-28· cited 76×
- Millstein v. MillsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-03-11· cited 48×
- Trumpp v. TrumppSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-12-27· cited 34×
- Kohn v. KohnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-09-27· cited 33×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Tokach v. TokachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-03-02· cited 32×
- VanKirk v. VanKirkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-12-14· cited 30×
- McGough v. McGoughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-03-19· cited 27×
- Pacella v. PacellaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-04-26· cited 26×
- Kleintop v. KleintopSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-10-23· cited 25×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.