Skip to main content

Lipschutz v. Lipschutz

Citations

  • 571 A.2d 1046
  • 391 Pa. Super. 537
  • 1990 Pa. Super. LEXIS 76

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • wife who obtained support order was not estopped from enforcing prior private settlement agreement regarding support
  • \A property settlement agreement is enforceable by utilizing the same rules of law used in determining the validity of contracts\
  • order of support entered subsequent to parties’ divorce and to parties’ execution of property settlement agreement containing support provisions did not supercede agreement; both order and agreement were intact and enforceable
  • order of support entered subsequent to parties' divorce and to parties' execution of property settlement agreement containing support provisions did not supercede agreement; both order and agreement were intact and enforceable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McEwen, Olszewski, Tamilia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Lipschutz v. Lipschutz

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.