Rhoades v. Pryce

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that where the imposition of sanctions causes the contemnor to suffer harm or a penalty, the contempt order is appealable
• stating that “sanctions for contempt cannot simply be a requirement that the con-temnor do as directed, i.e., pay arrearag-es”
• stating that “sanctions for contempt cannot simply be a requirement that the contemnor do as directed, i.e., pay arrearages”
• stating that “sanctions for contempt cannot simply be a requirement that the contemnor do as directed, i.e., pay arrearages”
• stating that “sanctions for contempt cannot simply be a requirement that the con-temnor do as directed, i.e., pay arrearag-es”
• stating that “sanctions for contempt cannot simply be a requirement that the contemnor do as directed, i.e., pay arrearages”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).