Michaelson v. United States Ex Rel. Chicago, St. P., M. & OR Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the inherent power of federal courts to punish for contempt is subject to regulation by Congress, provided such regulation neither “abrogate[s] [that power], nor render[s] it practically inoperative”
• recognizing that the Constitution vests courts with some powers unalterable by legislation
• recognizing that the Constitution vests courts with some powers unalterable by legislation
• recognizing the inherent power of the courts to punish for con-tempts as essential to the administration of justice
• recognizing that the Constitution vests courts with some powers unalterable by legisla- tion
• recognizing that the Constitution vests courts with some powers unalterable by legisla- tion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).