K.M.G. v. H.M.W.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[t]his Court may examine appealability sua sponte because it affects our jurisdiction over the matter” (citation omitted and formatting altered)
• stating that when the trial court makes a correction it “shall direct that a supplemental record be certified and transmitted” to the appellate court considering the appeal
• reversing contempt finding for the mother’s failure to encourage the child to visit with the father where the order did not specifically require such encouragement
• setting forth the requirements of contempt: (1) a definite, clear, and specific order; (2) notice of such order; (3) a volitional act; and (4) wrongful intent
• “This Court may examine appealability sua sponte because it affects our jurisdiction over the matter.”
• “This Court may examine appealability sua sponte because it affects our jurisdiction over the matter.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• E.B. v. D.B.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-05-06· cited 107×
• E.K. v. J.R.A.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-08-07· cited 99×

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Stahl v. Redcay
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-03-17· cited 153×
• Lachat v. Hinchliffe
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-02-20· cited 131×
• Sonder v. Sonder
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-09-29· cited 126×
• Commonwealth v. Thoeun Tha
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-04-02· cited 126×
• Rhoades v. Pryce
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-04-28· cited 91×
• McManus v. Chubb Group of Insurance
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-03-29· cited 50×
• Kenis v. Perini Corp.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-09-18· cited 49×
• In re Estate of Fritts
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-08-17· cited 49×
• Mrozek v. James
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-07-06· cited 44×
• Genovese v. Genovese
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-12-02· cited 43×
• In re N.B.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-02-07· cited 38×
• Bold v. Bold
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-12-04· cited 36×
• Hester v. Bagnato
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-11-13· cited 36×
• N.A.M. v. M.P.W.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-08-07· cited 35×
• Equipment Finance, Inc. v. Grannas
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1966-03-24· cited 35×
• Takosky v. Henning
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-08-25· cited 34×
• Brodsky v. Philadelphia Athletic Club, Inc.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-05-02· cited 25×
• In re K.K.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-09-10· cited 25×
• Sargent v. Sargent
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-06-21· cited 22×
• Rulli v. Dunn
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-01-25· cited 19×

Other cases named K.M.G. v. H.M.W.

6 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• K.M.G. v. H.M.W.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-09-29
• K.M.G. v. H.M.W.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-09-29
• K.M.G. v. H.M.W.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-09-29
• K.M.G. v. H.M.W.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-09-29
• K.M.G. v. H.M.W.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-09-29
• K.M.G. v. H.M.W.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-09-29