Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 3/29/1976

Janet D. v. Carros

Citations

240 Pa. Super. 291
362 A.2d 1060
1976 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2123

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

if one of parties to controversy will continue to suffer some detriment from lower court’s decision, appeal will be heard
if one of parties to controversy will continue to suffer some detriment from lower court's decision, appeal will be heard
Juvenile Court Act, 11 P.S. §§ 50-101 et seq., provides civilly committed juveniles a right to treatment
the juvenile court and the child’s custodian share the responsibility of developing and carrying out a plan of treatment which is appropriate to the individualized needs of each child
in cases where children were not permitted to be kept in shelter facilities for more than three months and the time for fact-finding and appellate review would exceed that time, issues were capable of repetition yet likely to evade review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spaeth, Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Cercone, Price, Van Voort Spaeth, Van Voort

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.