Skip to main content
· 3/29/1976

Janet D. v. Carros

Citations

  • 240 Pa. Super. 291
  • 362 A.2d 1060
  • 1976 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2123

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • if one of parties to controversy will continue to suffer some detriment from lower court’s decision, appeal will be heard
  • if one of parties to controversy will continue to suffer some detriment from lower court's decision, appeal will be heard
  • Juvenile Court Act, 11 P.S. §§ 50-101 et seq., provides civilly committed juveniles a right to treatment
  • the juvenile court and the child’s custodian share the responsibility of developing and carrying out a plan of treatment which is appropriate to the individualized needs of each child
  • in cases where children were not permitted to be kept in shelter facilities for more than three months and the time for fact-finding and appellate review would exceed that time, issues were capable of repetition yet likely to evade review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spaeth, Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Cercone, Price, Van Voort Spaeth, Van Voort

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.