Court of Appeals of Maryland· 11/9/1976
Blackwell v. State
Citations
- 365 A.2d 545
- 278 Md. 466
- 1976 Md. LEXIS 649
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the prosecutor was entitled to respond to defense counsel’s remarks about celebrated criminals that received life sentences, rather than the death penalty
- “In first degree murder indictments filed pursuant to this provision, it is well settled that murder in the second degree and manslaughter are lesser included offenses”
- not required when “there is no evidence supporting conviction of a lesser degree”
- not required when \there is no evidence supporting conviction of a lesser degree\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Singley, Smith, Digges, Levine, Eldridge, Orth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1980-06-20· cited 2,209×
- Tichnell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-06-10· cited 300×
- Degren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-01-14· cited 158×
- Dykes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-04-11· cited 140×
- Hook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-02-13· cited 124×
- Stevenson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-12-17· cited 109×
- Commonwealth v. MoodySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-11-30· cited 108×
- State v. WardCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-12-21· cited 93×
- Hagans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-06-30· cited 83×
- Hof v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-03-10· cited 80×
- Gunning v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-10-14· cited 76×
- Sims v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-05-30· cited 71×
- Spain v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-04-07· cited 70×
- Mills v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-06-25· cited 69×
- Dishman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-12-21· cited 68×
- State v. ChaneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-06-10· cited 64×
- State v. ByrnesSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1981-07-31· cited 63×
- Lansdowne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-02-29· cited 56×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-02-21· cited 54×
- Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-06-13· cited 53×
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 7,936×
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 5,066×
- Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 3,922×
- Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1976-07-02· cited 2,907×
- Jurek v. TexasSupreme Court· 1976-07-02· cited 2,034×
- Proffitt v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 1,798×
- Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1972-10-10· cited 1,226×
- Roberts v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1976-10-12· cited 802×
- Wilhelm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-09-26· cited 259×
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-07-15· cited 210×
- Midgett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-09-01· cited 150×
- Chisley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1953-03-20· cited 147×
- Bartholomey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1972-12-04· cited 115×
- Shell Oil Co. v. Supervisor of AssessmentsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-09-09· cited 113×
- Davidson v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-09-18· cited 109×
- Bruce v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-09-11· cited 95×
- Shoemaker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1962-05-01· cited 68×
- State v. RondeauNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1976-08-20· cited 63×
- Schanker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1955-07-27· cited 44×
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1955-03-25· cited 37×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.