Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 12/2/1996
Robertson v. State
Citations
- 685 A.2d 805
- 112 Md. App. 366
- 1996 Md. App. LEXIS 163
- 1996 WL 688285
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Because an alibi is not an affirmative defense, a specific alibi instruction eliminates the possibility that the jury will place the burden of proof on the defense with respect to that issue.”
- Maryland follows federal court principles that “a defendant is entitled to have the judge instruct the jury on his theory of defense provided that it is supported by law and has some foundation in the evidence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Getty, Harrell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SimmsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-07-15· cited 75×
- General v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-01-14· cited 36×
- Marr v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-09-11· cited 25×
- Green v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-02-03· cited 24×
- Martin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-10-28· cited 21×
- Simms v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-09-03· cited 12×
- Molock v. Dorchester County Family YMCA, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-08-30· cited 11×
- Boone v. AMERICAN MANUFACTURE'S MUT. INS. CO.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-03-26· cited 11×
- Schmitt v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-08-31· cited 10×
- Cousar v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-04-28· cited 9×
- Moye v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-07-09· cited 5×
- Goldsberry v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-10-06· cited 5×
- Dishman v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-12-01· cited 5×
- In Re Lavar D.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-12-30· cited 4×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2019-01-18· cited 4×
- Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. HartCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-02-02· cited 2×
- State v. MannCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2019-12-19· cited 2×
- Boone v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-03-26· cited 1×
- State v. StalterNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2023-03-21
- Edwards v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2025-10-31
Cites
43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- United States v. Crystal Mason, Edward YoungNinth Circuit· 1990-05-10· cited 184×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-07-17· cited 171×
- McKenna v. NevadaSupreme Court· 1986-01-21· cited 153×
- Bruce v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-09-11· cited 95×
- United States v. William H. Wilson, Jr.First Circuit· 1986-07-30· cited 93×
- Couser v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-03-10· cited 87×
- Hof v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-03-10· cited 80×
- Binnie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-01-10· cited 77×
- United States v. Jesse LewisFifth Circuit· 1979-04-10· cited 76×
- State v. GradyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-10-07· cited 72×
- United States v. Thomas F. ScafeTenth Circuit· 1987-06-15· cited 71×
- Sims v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-05-30· cited 71×
- United States v. Leonard FinestoneEleventh Circuit· 1987-05-07· cited 70×
- United States v. Benjamin Jerome Hicks, United States of America v. Frankie RandallFourth Circuit· 1984-11-07· cited 69×
- Commonwealth v. FromalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-03-22· cited 68×
- Albert B. Brooke v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1967-05-23· cited 67×
- Jack Henry Smith v. S. Lamont Smith, Warden, Georgia State PrisonFifth Circuit· 1972-02-01· cited 59×
- United States v. Steven CarterSeventh Circuit· 1990-09-25· cited 56×
- Lansdowne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-02-29· cited 56×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.