Court of Appeals of Maryland· 3/6/1987
State v. Crawford
Citations
- 521 A.2d 1193
- 308 Md. 683
- 1987 Md. LEXIS 197
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- setting forth same necessity instruction to charge of possession of a firearm by convicted felon
- applying the common law choice of evils defense in the absence of a statute
- explicating the specific requirements for necessity when unlawfully possessing a firearm
- reasonable apprehension of imminent danger element of defense to unlawful possession of handgun
- reasonable apprehension of imminent danger element of defense to unlawful possession of handgun
- defense of necessity exists to charge of carrying a concealed weapon
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Eldridge, Cole, Rodowsky, Couch, McAuliffe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Eanes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-02-08· cited 69×
- Marquardt v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-09-08· cited 57×
- Blue v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-09-27· cited 52×
- Wynn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-09-01· cited 49×
- Wieland v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1994-06-28· cited 45×
- Humphrey v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2001-10-23· cited 36×
- People v. DupreeMichigan Court of Appeals· 2009-05-28· cited 33×
- State v. CastrilloNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1991-10-15· cited 31×
- Eldridge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-02-10· cited 29×
- State v. RamosSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-11-23· cited 25×
- Marrero v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-12-15· cited 23×
- Webb v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-02-10· cited 22×
- McMillan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-08-24· cited 22×
- Mangum v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-05-15· cited 20×
- Conaty v. SolemSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-04-13· cited 15×
- State v. MaumalangaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1998-08-11· cited 11×
- State v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2023-07-12· cited 7×
- Graham v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-06-26· cited 5×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-10-30· cited 5×
- Howell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2019-08-22· cited 5×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. James Thomas NolanNinth Circuit· 1983-06-13· cited 119×
- United States v. Edgar Cherry GantFifth Circuit· 1982-11-09· cited 113×
- People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court· 1978-08-29· cited 97×
- Bruce v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-09-11· cited 95×
- Sigma Reproductive Health Center v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-11-22· cited 90×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-05-18· cited 85×
- State v. BlacheSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1985-12-02· cited 60×
- State v. SpauldingSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-08-29· cited 51×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-01-10· cited 50×
- Medley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1982-07-14· cited 48×
- United States v. Henry AgardSecond Circuit· 1979-09-17· cited 47×
- Frasher v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1970-01-14· cited 33×
- State v. WaltonSupreme Court of Iowa· 1981-10-21· cited 27×
- Osborne v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1981-10-07· cited 23×
- Mungin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-11-09· cited 16×
- United States v. Lonnie Dwain Clark, A/K/A Chick ClarkFifth Circuit· 1984-08-31· cited 12×
- Duvall v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1979-10-26· cited 11×
- Crawford v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-02-13· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.