Pippins v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding a defense attorney’s characterization of his previous representation of a prosecution witness as a conflict “does not necessarily make it so”
• concluding a defense attorney’s characterization of his previous representation of a prosecution witness as a conflict “does not necessarily make it so”
• holding a defense attorney’s prior representation of a victim in an unrelated civil case was not a conflict of interest
• concluding a defense attorney’s characterization of his previous representation of a prosecution witness as a conflict “does not necessarily make it so”
• noting one test for determining whether a conflict exists is “whether an attorney is placed in a situation conducive to divided loyalties”
• noting one test for determining whether a conflict exists is “whether an attorney is placed in a situation conducive to divided loyalties”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).