Court of Appeals of Maryland· 9/11/2001
Bruce v. State
Citations
- 145 A.2d 428
- 218 Md. 87
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding as proper a jury instruction that permitted inference of “specific intent to take life” from use of deadly weapon on vital part of victim’s body
- discussing elements of self defense in a review of jury instructions given on the subject
- observing that “an attempted battery may be met by resisting force with force provided no unnecessary violence was used and proper measures were taken to avoid the conflict and escape from shedding blood” (emphasis added)
- observing that “an attempted battery may be met by resisting force with force provided no unnecessary violence was used and proper measures were taken to avoid the conflict and escape from shedding blood” (emphasis added)
- “it is incumbent upon the court, ... when requested in a criminal case, to give an ... instruction on every essential question or point of law supported by evidence”
- An “instruction on every essential question or point of law” is an “advisory” instruction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brune, C.J., and Henderson, Hammond, Prescott and Horney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
73 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-01-09· cited 660×
- Tichnell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-06-10· cited 300×
- Evans v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-11-25· cited 201×
- Dykes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-04-11· cited 140×
- Burch v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-07-03· cited 112×
- State v. FaulknerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-11-21· cited 109×
- Binnie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-01-10· cited 77×
- Dillon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-05-04· cited 68×
- Blackwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-11-09· cited 67×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-12-07· cited 61×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-10-22· cited 57×
- Lindsay v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1969-11-17· cited 57×
- Lansdowne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-02-29· cited 56×
- Unger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-05-24· cited 52×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-01-10· cited 50×
- Bennett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1963-02-06· cited 46×
- Gunther v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1962-04-19· cited 45×
- Hill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-09-19· cited 42×
- Huber v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1967-10-20· cited 40×
- Hardison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1961-06-30· cited 40×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chisley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1953-03-20· cited 147×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1954-02-11· cited 69×
- Webb v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1952-12-05· cited 53×
- Proctor Electric Co. v. ZinkCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1958-05-20· cited 41×
- Smith v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1886-06-24· cited 27×
- Lester v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1931-06-19· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.