Skip to main content

Bruce v. State

Citations

  • 145 A.2d 428
  • 218 Md. 87

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding as proper a jury instruction that permitted inference of “specific intent to take life” from use of deadly weapon on vital part of victim’s body
  • discussing elements of self defense in a review of jury instructions given on the subject
  • observing that “an attempted battery may be met by resisting force with force provided no unnecessary violence was used and proper measures were taken to avoid the conflict and escape from shedding blood” (emphasis added)
  • observing that “an attempted battery may be met by resisting force with force provided no unnecessary violence was used and proper measures were taken to avoid the conflict and escape from shedding blood” (emphasis added)
  • “it is incumbent upon the court, ... when requested in a criminal case, to give an ... instruction on every essential question or point of law supported by evidence”
  • An “instruction on every essential question or point of law” is an “advisory” instruction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brune, C.J., and Henderson, Hammond, Prescott and Horney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

73 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.