Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 9/11/2000
Marr v. State
Citations
- 759 A.2d 327
- 134 Md. App. 152
- 2000 Md. App. LEXIS 151
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- characterizing the holding in Hoerauf as, “where the suspect does not invoke his Miranda right after ‘his entry into the interrogation room,’ his prior invocation was not valid, i.e., such invocation was not made in the context of custodial interrogation”
- characterizing the holding in Hoerauf as, “where the suspect does not invoke his Miranda right after ‘his entry into the interrogation room,’ his prior invocation was not valid, ie., such invocation was not made in the context of custodial interrogation”
- “Because appellant’s purported invocation, through his attorney, occurred before appellant was in custody, it could not operate to invoke his Fifth Amendment right to counsel.”
- appellant did not validly invoke Fifth Amendment right to counsel because invocation by counsel occurred outside of context of custodial interrogation
- “the delay in bringing the defendant before' a judicial officer after an arrest is only one factor, among others, to be considered by the court in deciding the voluntariness and admissibility of a confession.”
- “[T]he delay in bringing the defendant before a judicial officer after an arrest is ‘only one factor, among others, to be considered by the court in deciding the voluntariness and admissibility of a confession.’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eyler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Marquardt v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-09-08· cited 57×
- State v. MarrCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-01-16· cited 28×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-01-04· cited 26×
- Conboy v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-03-02· cited 24×
- Ashford v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-09-12· cited 23×
- Hoerauf v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-02-08· cited 21×
- Facon v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-02-05· cited 21×
- State v. HurstIdaho Court of Appeals· 2011-05-18· cited 17×
- Costley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-06-28· cited 16×
- Perez v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-02-03· cited 13×
- Bey v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-09-26· cited 12×
- In re Darryl P.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-03-25· cited 12×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-10-01· cited 11×
- Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2015-02-06· cited 11×
- State v. RelfordNebraska Court of Appeals· 2001-02-27· cited 9×
- White v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-09-19· cited 2×
- Gupta v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-03-24· cited 2×
- 109OAG3Maryland Attorney General Reports· 2024-01-17
Cites
64 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,571×
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 5,250×
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court· 1986-03-10· cited 3,339×
- McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1991-06-13· cited 1,818×
- New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court· 1984-06-12· cited 1,468×
- Michigan v. TuckerSupreme Court· 1974-06-10· cited 1,437×
- Colorado v. SpringSupreme Court· 1987-01-27· cited 1,070×
- Beckwith v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-04-21· cited 1,005×
- Commonwealth v. HallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-09-17· cited 237×
- Riddick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-04-11· cited 173×
- MacK v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-08-23· cited 168×
- Dykes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-04-11· cited 140×
- Harold S. Alston v. Walter Redman, Warden Charles M. Oberly, Iii, Attorney General of the State of Delaware and the State of DelawareThird Circuit· 1994-09-07· cited 136×
- United States v. Matthew LagroneSeventh Circuit· 1994-12-28· cited 132×
- Trusty v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-03-04· cited 124×
- State v. BradshawWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1995-03-27· cited 123×
- Ball v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-09-10· cited 121×
- United States v. GrimesEleventh Circuit· 1998-06-08· cited 103×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-04-06· cited 98×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.