Skip to main content

Smart v. State

Citations

  • 299 Ga. 414
  • 788 S.E.2d 442
  • 2016 Ga. LEXIS 458

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it was not plain error for the trial court to admit hearsay about prior difficulties from two witnesses, Facebook messages, text messages, and letters written by the victim
  • holding that evidence regarding prior acts of domestic violence by defendant against victim was admissible under Rule 404 (b) to show defendant’s motive
  • holding that the trial court’s telling 6 The court had discretion to redact the indictment to remove Harris’s name, see Moss v. State, 298 Ga. 613, 615 (783 SE2d 652) (2016
  • concluding that because the evidence in question was admissible to show motive, it was not necessary to determine if it was also admissible to show intent or absence of mistake
  • explaining that “in light of the often-secretive nature of domestic violence,” statements from a murder victim to her friends and family describing acts of domestic violence can be “highly probative”
  • noting that a domestic-violence victim’s own writings and text messages to family and friends may be “highly probative,” given the “often-secretive nature of domestic violence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

73 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.