Skip to main content

Strong v. State

Citations

  • 845 S.E.2d 653
  • 309 Ga. 295

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court abused its discretion under Rule 403 by admitting evidence of prior violent acts to show the appellant’s intent
  • concluding that the violent nature of the erroneously admitted prior act contributed to its prejudicial value
  • concluding that the evidence was sufficient as a constitutional matter to support the 52 appellant’s conviction for felony murder, even though “the evidence that [he] did not act in self-defense was not overwhelming”
  • holding that the State’s argument that the other acts showed the defendant’s motive “‘to control other people’ with violence . . . ‘is a classic improper propensity argument, focusing on [his] violent . . . character’” (citation omitted)
  • explaining that the unfair prejudicial effect of other-act evidence was made worse because “as far as the jury knew, Appellant had escaped any punishment for this litany of” other crimes
  • noting that the Rule 404 (b) analysis requires consideration of both the similarities and the dissimilarities between the other acts evidence and the charged crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.