Williams v. Moody

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the habeas court erred by not analyzing whether appellate counsel’s failure to raise ineffective assistance of trial counsel claims was the result of his conflict of interest or a strategic decision
• “Apro se motion filed by a convicted defendant while represented by counsel is ‘unauthorized and without effect.’ ” (quoting Cotton)
• “A pro se motion filed by a convicted defendant while represented by counsel is ‘unauthorized and without effect.’” (citation omitted)
• \A pro se motion filed by a convicted defendant while represented by counsel is 'unauthorized and without effect.' [Cit.]\
• \A pro se motion filed by a convicted defendant while represented by counsel is unauthorized and without effect.\
• “A pro se motion filed by a convicted defendant while represented by counsel is ‘unauthorized and without effect.’ [Cit.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).