Skip to main content

State v. Hamilton

Citations

  • 839 S.E.2d 560
  • 308 Ga. 116

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “Rule 807’s residual hearsay exception is designed to be used very rarely, and only in exceptional circumstances”
  • noting that “Rule 807’s residual hearsay exception is designed to be used very rarely, and only in exceptional circumstances.”
  • noting that typically, more general statutory provisions do not override more specific ones
  • noting that “Confrontation Clause protections are not available for the State to assert”
  • affirming trial court’s ruling where, although the trial court abused its discretion in admitting former testimony under OCGA § 24-8-804 (b) (1), “that conclusion [did] not end our review . . . because after conducting its Rule 804 (b) (1
  • trial court’s decision to admit hearsay under Rule 807 reviewed for an abuse of discretion, considering the totality of the 29 circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.