Skip to main content

State v. Kelly

Citations

  • 718 S.E.2d 232
  • 290 Ga. 29
  • 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 3440
  • 2011 Ga. LEXIS 860

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court did not commit clear or obvious error, where the appellant’s argument conflicted with controlling precedent
  • holding that unobjected to jury instructions are subject to plain-error review when the defendant subsequently alleges in his motion for a new trial and on appeal that the instruction was erroneous
  • noting that OCGA § 17-8-58 (b), effective July 1, 2007, provides that unobjected-to jury charges are reviewed only for plain error
  • noting that the “error or defect” must not have been “intentionally relinquished or abandoned, i.e., affirmatively waived, by the appellant”
  • explaining that OCGA § 17-8-58 (b) on “plain error” applies to criminal cases while OCGA § 5-5-24 (c) on “substantial error” applies to civil cases
  • providing that an appellant attempting to meet his burden under the plain-error standard must show that “the legal error [is] clear or obvious, rather than subject to reasonable dispute[ ]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunstein, Carley, Hines

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

460 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.