Skip to main content

Shaw v. State

Citations

  • 292 Ga. 871
  • 742 S.E.2d 707
  • 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 1467
  • 2013 WL 1859299
  • 2013 Ga. LEXIS 417

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that under plain error analysis, the defendant must show that the trial court’s errors “probably affected the verdict”
  • finding that the trial lawyer’s explanation for not calling the children as witnesses — that the evidence they could provide could be elicited from other witnesses — was not unreasonable
  • finding that the trial lawyer’s explanation for not calling the children as witnesses – that the evidence they could provide could be elicited from other witnesses – was not unreasonable
  • noting that “harmless-error” analysis is different from “plain-error analysis”
  • affirming conviction because the defendant “had a fair opportunity to present evidence of 8 his claim of self-defense through his own testimony at trial” and because “[t]he charges given . . . fairly informed the jury as to the law of self-defense”
  • “[T]he jury is free to reject a defendant’s claim that he acted in self-defense.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blackwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

111 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.