Skip to main content

Harris v. State

Citations

  • 314 Ga. 238

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court abused its discretion under Rule 403 by admitting evidence of the appellant’s sexual activities on the day before the victim’s death, which had “trivial probative value” and was “very prejudicial”
  • explaining that “‘compelling properly admitted evidence of guilt’” may offset a high risk of prejudice from improperly admitted evidence
  • noting that evidence of an alleged motive that lacks a specific, logical link to the alleged crimes often supports only improper propensity arguments
  • noting that “‘[i]t does not follow because an accused person may have a bad character that he is guilty of the particular offense for which he is being tried’”
  • reversing the appellant’s convictions due to the improper admission of evidence under Rule 403, which was not harmless, because the evidence was highly prejudicial and the proof of the appellant’s guilt “was not ‘overwhelming,’ ‘compelling,’ or even strong”
  • assuming without deciding that evidence of the appellant’s sexual messages and conduct was relevant under Rule 401 to prove his motive to murder the victim before ultimately concluding that much of the evidence was not admissible under Rule 403

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

62 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.