Skip to main content

Pritchett v. State

Citations

  • 879 S.E.2d 436
  • 314 Ga. 767

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial counsel’s failure to object to testimony that was neither “inconsistent with, [n]or undercut, the defense’s strategy at trial” was not deficient performance
  • concluding that the prosecutor’s assertion that other- act evidence was admissible to show that the appellant had the motive “‘to use violence to control anyone around him’” was an improper propensity argument
  • explaining that the State is not required to prove motive because it is not an essential element of a crime
  • noting that the other-act evidence, which showed “a unique pattern or plan,” was admitted “to establish [the defendant’s] identity”
  • where 19 defense theory was inconsistent with the physical evidence, jury was authorized to find beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant did not act in self-defense
  • evi- dence was sufficient for the jury to reject the defendant’s self-de- fense theory when forensic and crime scene evidence did not sup- port that theory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.