Second Circuit· 8/25/2021

Singh v. Garland

Citations

11 F.4th 106

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that petitioner’s “ability to relocate internally means that he cannot establish [the] likelihood of torture” necessary to state a claim for CAT relief
concluding that agency 20 did not err in concluding that Government met its burden of 21 establishing ability to relocate where substantial evidence 5 1 supported agency’s relocation findings
explaining that an applicant’s “ability to relocate internally means that he cannot establish a likelihood of torture”
noting that, as with asylum, withholding of removal is not available where the applicant could safely internally relocate
finding that the agency was not “required to attribute an attack by 17 members of a regional party in Punjab to the national government of India” or to 18 “local authorities”
reasoning that “[a]sylum and other forms of immigration relief are individual remedies designed to avoid persecution inflicted on particular persons,” and “[g]eneral country-conditions evidence does not on its own compel the conclusion that an individual will be persecuted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Singh v. Garland

9 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.