Skip to main content
· 5/22/2000

Svetlana Galina and Viatcheslav Galin v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Citations

  • 213 F.3d 955
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 11356
  • 2000 WL 656350

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • warning that State Department reports warrant a “healthy skepticism” and the BIA should not treat them as “Holy Writ”
  • noting that country reports are “brief and general, and may fail to identify specific, perhaps local, dangers to particular, perhaps obscure, individuals”
  • finding that petitioner suffered persecution despite some police action in response to threatening phone calls
  • noting that country reports are “brief and general, and may fail to identify specific, perhaps local, dangers to particular, perhaps obscure, individuals”
  • warning that State Department reports warrant a “healthy skepti- cism” and the BIA should not treat them as “Holy Writ”
  • explaining that an applicant must show that the government condoned private actions “or at least demonstrated a complete helplessness to protect the victims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Fairchild, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.