Xiu Xia Lin v. Mukasey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that alien’s failure to include length of detention in asylum application was substantial evidence supporting IJ’s adverse credibility determination
• holding that “an IJ may rely on any inconsistency or omission in making an adverse credibility determination ... ”
• holding that “an IJ may rely on any inconsistency or omission in making an adverse credibility determination”
• holding that an IJ may support an adverse credibility determination with “any inconsistency or omission”
• holding that the agency may rely on “any inconsistency,” as considered with the totality of the circumstances, in making an adverse credibility determination
• concluding that omission in application and her father’s letter regarding the length of her detention supported adverse credibility determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).