Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 10/4/2024

Singh v. Garland

Citations

  • 118 F.4th 1150

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “identical phrases or words” is a “telltale sign[] of a canned or plagiarized affidavit”
  • faulting the IJ for not relying on similarities in “narrative structure”
  • faulting the IJ for relying “solely” on “non-unique” factual similarities
  • “[T]he court is not limited to the particular legal theories advanced by the parties, [and] retains the independent power to identify and apply the proper construction of governing law.” (quoting Kamen v. Kemper Fin. Servs., Inc., 500 U.S. 90, 99 (1991))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.