Skip to main content
· 1/20/2006

Surinder Singh v. Bia

Citations

  • 435 F.3d 216
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 1377
  • 2006 WL 147500

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that even a presumption of future persecution can be rebutted if the agency finds that an applicant can avoid persecution by relocating to another part of the proposed country of removal
  • recognizing that even a presumption of future persecution can be rebutted if the agency finds that an applicant can avoid persecution by relocating to another part of the proposed country of removal
  • noting that “country condition reports may in some circumstances be sufficient, in and of themselves, to support a finding of no clear probability of persecution”
  • upholding denial of withholding where record demonstrated that petitioner could relocate safely elsewhere in India
  • “Asylum in the United 3 States is not available to obviate re-location to sanctuary 4 in one’s own country.”
  • “Asylum in the United States is not available to 14 obviate re-location to sanctuary in one’s own country.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oakes, Jacobs, Straub

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.