Sk Shahriair Majidi v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that dramatically different account of incident relating to persecution claim \offers substantial evidence in support of IJ's credibility ruling\
• holding that dramatically different account of incident relating to persecution claim “offers substantial evidence in support of IJ’s credibility ruling”
• holding that IJ may find asylum applicant not credible based on inconsistency in his account affording substantial evidence “without soliciting from the applicant an explanation for the inconsistency”
• holding that the agency need not credit an explanation unless a reasonable fact-finder would be compelled to do so
• holding that the agency need not credit an applicant’s explanations for inconsistent .testimony unless those explanations would compel a reasonable fact-finder to do so
• holding that the agency need not credit an applicant’s explanations for inconsistent .testimony unless those explanations would compel a reasonable fact-finder to do so

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).