Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 7/28/2021

Singh v. Garland

Citations

  • 6 F.4th 418

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that whether an omission hurts credibility “depends in part on the importance that the omitted fact would have had for the purpose of the earlier telling”
  • explaining that, 17 “in a hypothetical case, a petitioner who later claims to 18 have been brutally beaten but omitted any reference to a 19 beating from his earlier description of his persecution 20 (there mentioning only less brutal conduct such as a slap in 21 the face
  • “Whether . . . such 21 statements are inconsistent depends in part on the importance 5 1 that the omitted fact would have had for the purpose of the 2 earlier telling.”
  • “Omissions are undoubtedly probative of untruthfulness in circumstances where 1 Contrary to Sherpa’s assertions, the agency did not err in relying on the interview record. See Ming Zhang v. Holder, 585 F.3d 715, 725 (2d Cir. 2009

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.