Skip to main content

Saunders v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 27 Cal. App. 4th 832
  • 33 Cal. Rptr. 2d 438
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 11400
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6284
  • 1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 843

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[i]t is not necessary 11 that the predicate law provide for civil enforcement” in order for a plaintiff to have a § 17200 12 claim
  • outlining the elements of equitable subordination claims and aiding and abetting fraud claims, respectively; defining neither simply as “fraud”
  • outlining the elements of equitable subordination claims and aiding and abetting fraud claims, respectively; defining neither simply as “fraud”
  • finding that aiding and abetting requires actual knowledge
  • \Unfair simply means any practice whose harm to the victim outweighs its benefits. Fraudulent... requires a showing [that] members of the public are likely to be deceived.\
  • “The ‘unlawful’ practices prohibited by section 17200 are any practices forbidden by law, be it civil or criminal, federal, state, or municipal, statutory, regulatory, or court-made.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.