California Court of Appeal· 3/25/1993
Cellular Plus, Inc. v. Superior Court
Citations
- 14 Cal. App. 4th 1224
- 18 Cal. Rptr. 2d 308
- 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2733
- 93 Daily Journal DAR 4689
- 1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 384
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the Cartwright Act requires a sufficient allegation of antitrust injury
- finding “filed-rate doctrine” inapplicable to cause of action for price fixing under the Cartwright Act
- “[The p]laintiff’s injuries were not ‘secondary’ or ‘consequential,’ since they did not result from injury to third parties; they were not ‘remote,’ for they were the direct result of the allegedly illegal conduct.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Work
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court· 1998-09-23· cited 514×
- San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1996-08-22· cited 250×
- Wasco Products, Inc. v. Southwall Technologies, Inc. Bostik, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2006-01-13· cited 244×
- Saunders v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1994-08-16· cited 220×
- Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-11-20· cited 198×
- Knevelbaard Dairies v. Kraft Foods, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2000-12-01· cited 154×
- Coll v. First American Title InsuranceTenth Circuit· 2011-04-26· cited 124×
- Richard L. Fowler v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 2018-09-24· cited 112×
- Transmission Agency of Northern California v. Sierra Pacific Power Company, Bonneville Power Administration, Pacificorp, and Portland General ElectricNinth Circuit· 2002-07-08· cited 109×
- Thrifty-Tel, Inc. v. BezenekCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1996-06-28· cited 92×
- Exxon Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1997-01-14· cited 63×
- In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Antitrust LitigationN.D. California· 2007-06-01· cited 61×
- ANGIE M. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1995-07-31· cited 59×
- In Re Hirenia C.California Court of Appeal· 1993-08-31· cited 48×
- Neilson v. City of California CityCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2005-11-03· cited 46×
- In re Wellpoint, Inc. Out-of-Network \UCR\ Rates LitigationC.D. California· 2012-09-06· cited 40×
- Salveson v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.E.D. New York· 2016-02-24· cited 39×
- In Re Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride Antitrust LitigationE.D. New York· 2001-10-01· cited 36×
- Rickley v. GoodfriendCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2013-01-16· cited 36×
- SARALE v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal· 2010-10-15· cited 33×
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,155×
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1977-10-03· cited 1,382×
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co.Supreme Court· 1990-05-14· cited 783×
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1922-11-13· cited 629×
- Mandeville Island Farms, Inc. v. American Crystal Sugar Co.Supreme Court· 1948-06-01· cited 499×
- Thompson v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1980-07-14· cited 357×
- Square D Co. v. Niagara Frontier Tariff Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-05-27· cited 339×
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1992-04-06· cited 271×
- Chicago Title Insurance v. Great Western Financial Corp.California Supreme Court· 1968-08-28· cited 153×
- Cianci v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1985-12-31· cited 135×
- Stein v. United Artists Corp.Ninth Circuit· 1982-11-03· cited 129×
- Wise v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal· 1963-12-06· cited 118×
- Waters v. Pacific Telephone Co.California Supreme Court· 1974-07-09· cited 97×
- Strang v. CabrolCalifornia Supreme Court· 1984-12-27· cited 70×
- G.H.I.I. v. MTS, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1983-09-23· cited 67×
- Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionD.C. Circuit· 1968-06-21· cited 61×
- Kolling v. Dow Jones & Co.California Court of Appeal· 1982-11-24· cited 56×
- Banerian v. O'MALLEYCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1974-10-23· cited 50×
- Mailand v. BurckleCalifornia Supreme Court· 1978-01-05· cited 46×
- Truta v. Avis Rent a Car System, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1987-07-20· cited 44×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.