Ninth Circuit· 9/20/2010
Shroyer v. New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc.
Citations
- 622 F.3d 1035
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 19814
- 51 Communications Reg. (P&F) 535
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding, although plaintiff sufficiently 25 alleged breach of contract, he failed to state § 17200 claim based on unlawful practices 26 as he did \not go beyond alleging a violation of common law\
- describing the UCL as “establishing three varieties of unfair business practices[:]” unlawful, unfair, or fraudulent business practices.
- noting propriety of dismissal \where there is no cognizable legal theory or an absence of sufficient facts alleged to support a cognizable legal theory\
- affirming dismissal of 10 declaratory relief claims where dismissal of underlying claims also affirmed
- affirming dismissal of declaratory relief claims where dismissal of underlying 25 claims also affirmed
- court may dismiss case “only where there is no cognizable legal theory or an absence of sufficient facts alleged to support a cognizable legal theory.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Canby, Rawlinson, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
84 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Conservation Force v. SalazarNinth Circuit· 2011-07-22· cited 783×
- Los Angeles Lakers, Inc. v. Federal Insurance Co.Ninth Circuit· 2017-08-23· cited 221×
- Cook v. BrewerNinth Circuit· 2011-03-16· cited 218×
- Oregon Public Employees Retirement Fund v. Apollo Group Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2014-12-16· cited 180×
- Airs Aromatics, LLC v. Opinion Victoria's Secret Stores Brand Management, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2014-02-28· cited 99×
- Caltex Plastics, Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Ninth Circuit· 2016-06-08· cited 68×
- Donnitta Sinclair v. City of SeattleNinth Circuit· 2023-03-01· cited 54×
- Miller v. Ghirardelli Chocolate Co.N.D. California· 2012-12-07· cited 49×
- United States ex rel. Modglin v. DJO Global Inc.C.D. California· 2014-09-02· cited 44×
- Viggiano v. Hansen Natural Corp.C.D. California· 2013-05-13· cited 44×
- California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Shiloh Group, LLCN.D. California· 2017-07-24· cited 36×
- Stewart v. Electrolux Home Prods., Inc.E.D. California· 2018-01-08· cited 31×
- In re HSBC Bank, USA, N.A., Debit Card Overdraft Fee LitigationE.D. New York· 2014-03-05· cited 27×
- Varsam v. Laboratory Corp. of AmericaS.D. California· 2015-08-03· cited 25×
- Fresno Unified School District v. K.U.E.D. California· 2013-10-28· cited 21×
- In re Premera Blue Cross Customer Data Security Breach LitigationD. Oregon· 2016-08-01· cited 20×
- Arnett v. Bank of AmericaD. Oregon· 2012-07-11· cited 20×
- Penermon v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.N.D. California· 2014-06-11· cited 19×
- Fujitsu Ltd. v. Belkin International, Inc.N.D. California· 2011-03-29· cited 16×
- Enriquez v. Countrywide Home Loans, FSBD. Hawaii· 2011-08-31· cited 13×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesNinth Circuit· 2001-05-04· cited 2,878×
- Navarro v. BlockNinth Circuit· 2001-05-11· cited 2,226×
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1992-07-30· cited 1,052×
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Central Office Telephone, Inc.Supreme Court· 1998-06-15· cited 376×
- Moore v. Kayport Package Express, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1989-09-06· cited 345×
- Mirkin v. WassermanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1993-09-09· cited 252×
- Saunders v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1994-08-16· cited 220×
- OCM Principal Opportunities Fund, L.P. v. CIBC World Markets Corp.California Court of Appeal· 2007-12-05· cited 130×
- Steven Bastien v. At&t Wireless Services, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2000-03-06· cited 109×
- People ex rel. Lockyer v. Fremont Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-12-18· cited 62×
- National Rural Telecommunications Cooperative v. DIRECTV, Inc.C.D. California· 2003-06-05· cited 43×
- Gibson v. OFFICE OF ATTY. GEN., CALIFORNIANinth Circuit· 2009-03-18· cited 42×
- Allied Grape Growers v. Bronco Wine Co.California Court of Appeal· 1988-07-29· cited 38×
- Shroyer v. New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2010-05-26· cited 6×
Other cases named Shroyer v. New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc.
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.