Sybersound Records, Inc. v. UAV Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the licensing status of a copyrighted recording does not give rise to 26 a claim under § 1125(a)(1)(B)
• excluding false authorship claims from the Lanham Act in order to avoid “overlap between the Lanham and Copyright Acts”
• dismissing UCL 21 claim because the plaintiff could not state a claim under the Lanham Act
• breach-of-contract claim can be a predicate for a UCL claim “provided it also constitutes conduct that is unlawful, or unfair, or fraudulent”
• “fraudulent acts [under the UCL] are ones where members of the public are 21 likely to be deceived.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).