Day v. AT & T CORP.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “An 11 ‘unfair’ practice under section 17200 is one ‘whose harm to the victim outweighs it 12 benefits.’” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

85 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• In Re Tobacco II Cases
  California Supreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 705×
• Adams v. Northern Illinois Gas Co.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2004-04-01· cited 527×
• Gary Davis v. Hsbc Bank Nevada, N.A.
  Ninth Circuit· 2012-08-31· cited 390×
• Lavie v. Procter & Gamble Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 2003-01-17· cited 215×
• Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc.
  California Supreme Court· 2000-06-05· cited 187×
• Tenore v. AT&T Wireless Services
  Washington Supreme Court· 1998-09-10· cited 185×
• Colgan v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2006-01-10· cited 181×
• Knevelbaard Dairies v. Kraft Foods, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2000-12-01· cited 154×
• Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 2002-05-29· cited 138×
• Morgan v. AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2009-09-23· cited 125×
• Daniels v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2016-04-26· cited 117×
• Consumer Advocates v. Echostar Satellite Corp.
  California Court of Appeal· 2003-12-05· cited 116×
• Weinberg v. Sprint Corp.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2002-07-22· cited 98×
• Schnall v. Hertz Corporation
  California Court of Appeal· 2000-03-07· cited 90×
• BROCKET v. Moore
  California Court of Appeal· 2003-02-20· cited 83×
• Buller v. Sutter Health
  California Court of Appeal· 2008-03-05· cited 80×
• Aron v. U-Haul Co. of California
  California Court of Appeal· 2006-10-03· cited 79×
• Nagel v. Twin Laboratories, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2003-05-22· cited 77×
• Lippitt v. Raymond James Financial Services, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-08-25· cited 74×
• In re Tobacco Cases II
  California Court of Appeal· 2015-09-28· cited 68×

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.
  New York Court of Appeals· 1995-02-14· cited 1,009×
• MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
  Supreme Court· 1994-06-17· cited 584×
• Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.
  California Supreme Court· 1983-12-22· cited 477×
• Saunders v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1994-08-16· cited 220×
• State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1996-05-23· cited 159×
• Wegoland Ltd. v. NYNEX Corp.
  Second Circuit· 1994-05-20· cited 141×
• First Nationwide Savings v. Perry
  California Court of Appeal· 1992-12-03· cited 122×
• Porr v. NYNEX Corp.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1997-07-07· cited 120×
• Harriet Alicke v. MCI Communications Corporation
  D.C. Circuit· 1997-04-29· cited 69×
• Wegoland, Ltd. v. Nynex Corp.
  S.D. New York· 1992-11-13· cited 44×
• Marcus v. AT & T CORP.
  S.D. New York· 1996-08-21· cited 43×
• Platt v. Coldwell Banker Residential Real Estate Services
  California Court of Appeal· 1990-02-15· cited 42×
• State of California v. Levi Strauss & Co.
  California Supreme Court· 1986-03-20· cited 41×
• People v. Dollar Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1989-06-01· cited 40×
• Weinberg v. Sprint Corp.
  D. New Jersey· 1996-04-10· cited 23×
• People v. Thomas Shelton Powers, M.D., Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1992-01-02· cited 18×
• People Ex Rel. Smith v. Parkmerced Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1988-02-17· cited 15×