Skip to main content
· 5/23/1996

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 45 Cal. App. 4th 1093
  • 53 Cal. Rptr. 2d 229
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3713
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 5973
  • 1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 470

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “asserting a contractual right one does not have” may constitute an unfair business practice
  • “asserting a contractual right one does not have” may constitute an unfair business practice
  • “Because section 17200’s definition is disjunctive, a ‘business act or practice’ is prohibited if it is ‘unfair’ or ‘unlawful’ or ‘fraudulent.’ ”
  • “Virtually any law — federal, state or local — can serve as a predicate for a § 17200 action.”
  • abrogated on other grounds by Cel-Tech Communications, Inc., supra, 20 Cal.4th at 180, 83 Cal.Rptr.2d 548, 973 P.2d 527
  • each prong of the UCL is a “separate and distinct theory of liability”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Croskey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.