South Bay Chevrolet v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that defendant GMAC’s conduct was “not sufficiently uniform to allow representative treatment” in an automobile dealership’s lawsuit challenging GMAC’s method of calculating loan interest
• judgment in favor of defendant appropriate where plaintiff failed to provide “substantial evi-dentiary support that anyone was actually misled or likely to be misled”
• judgment in favor of defendant appropriate where plaintiff failed to provide “substantial evidentiary support that anyone was actually misled or likely to be misled”
• “ ‘Fraudulent,’ as used in the statute, does not refer to the common law tort of fraud but only requires a showing members of the public are likely to be deceived.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).