Skip to main content
· 6/9/2006

Roth, Pamela v. King, Rufus

Citations

  • 449 F.3d 1272
  • 371 U.S. App. D.C. 254
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 14237
  • 2006 WL 1563691

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to “resolve these knotty issues raised in connection with § 1292(b
  • “It is well established that judicial immunity extends to other officers of government whose duties are related to the judicial process.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “It is well established that judicial immunity ‘extends to other officers of government whose duties are related to the judicial process.’”
  • “Forrester stands for the unremarkable proposition that internal employment decisions made by judges are not judicial acts. Such acts have no relevance to the development and implementation of A[dministrative]O[rder] 03-11.”
  • “[Section 1983] explicitly immunizes judicial officers against suits for injunctive relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sentelle, Brown, Edwards

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.