New Vision Photography Program, Inc. v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing the requirements of the “reputation- plus test” for establishing a “protected liberty interest”
• noting on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, that courts may consider prior litigation records
• collecting cases and explaining that the “Supreme Court ‘has never held that government contracts for goods and services create property interests protected by due process’” (quoting 2 Richard J. Pierce Jr., Administrative Law Treatise 764 (5th ed. 2010))
• “[n]o matter how exacting the regulatory burden on an industry, this does not render an agency charged with ensuring industry compliance an employer for purposes of the ADEA”
• seven month delay after filing suit weighs against irreparable 23 harm
• treating claims the “[p]laintiff never addressed” as conceded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).