· 8/17/2004
JMM Corp. v. District of Columbia
Citations
- 378 F.3d 1117
- 363 U.S. App. D.C. 160
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 17015
- 2004 WL 1822721
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the plaintiff had a fair opportunity to raise constitutional claims as defenses in the state court proceeding
- noting litigant’s opportunity to raise constitutional claims as defenses in Superior Court proceeding
- a defendant in a District of Columbia proceeding has an opportunity to raise constitutional claims as defenses
- applying Younger rule to proceedings in the District of Colurnbia
- applying the Younger rule to District of Columbia enforcement proceedings
- petition seeking injunctive and declaratory relief
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Henderson, Randolph, Garland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.