Skip to main content
· 8/17/2004

JMM Corp. v. District of Columbia

Citations

  • 378 F.3d 1117
  • 363 U.S. App. D.C. 160
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 17015
  • 2004 WL 1822721

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the plaintiff had a fair opportunity to raise constitutional claims as defenses in the state court proceeding
  • noting litigant’s opportunity to raise constitutional claims as defenses in Superior Court proceeding
  • a defendant in a District of Columbia proceeding has an opportunity to raise constitutional claims as defenses
  • applying Younger rule to proceedings in the District of Colurnbia
  • applying the Younger rule to District of Columbia enforcement proceedings
  • petition seeking injunctive and declaratory relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henderson, Randolph, Garland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.