Reese v. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the 6 potential that a reversal could remove a defendant and several claims from the case satisfied the 7 material advancement element
• holding that an interlocutory appeal would materially advance resolution of litigation where reversal by the appellate court would not resolve the entire case
• holding that the 6 potential that a reversal could remove a defendant and several claims from the case satisfied the 7 material advancement element
• holding that the 6 potential that a reversal could remove a defendant and several claims from the case satisfied the 7 material advancement element
• holding that an interlocutory appeal would materially advance resolution of litigation where reversal by the appellate court would dismiss one defendant and resolve multiple claims against all defendants, even though it would not resolve the entire case
• holding that an interlocutory appeal would materially advance resolution of litigation where reversal by the appellate court would dismiss one defendant and resolve multiple claims against all defendants, even though it would not resolve the entire case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).