Skip to main content
· 5/9/1986

Pearline E. Freeman v. B & B Associates

Citations

  • 790 F.2d 145
  • 252 U.S. App. D.C. 323
  • 5 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 181
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 24831

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the court was precluded from considering an argument not properly raised by a cross- appeal
  • “An appellate court ... will freely consider any argument by an appellee that supports the judgment of the district court____”
  • “We find that under TILA an attorney has no cause of action for fees separate .from and independent of the underlying claim of his client,”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wright, Wald, Silberman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.