Gerald Alan Brown, and Charles v. Darnell v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Court of Federal Claims lacks jurisdiction over Fourth Amendment claims because they are not money-mandating
• holding that a violation of the Fourth Amendment does not mandate the payment of money
• concluding that the court's jurisdiction does not extend to suits against individual officials
• holding lhat \Bivens actions . . . lie outside the jurisdiction of the Court of Federal Claims\
• noting that the Court of Federal Claims \lacks jurisdiction over tort actions against the United States\
• holding that the Fourth Amendment is not money-mandating

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).