Skip to main content
· 3/28/2008

Hoai v. Superior Court of Dist. of Columbia

Citations

  • 539 F. Supp. 2d 432
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24741
  • 2008 WL 821744

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing suit against judges on D.C. Superior Court and D.C. Court of Appeals wherein plaintiff challenged those courts’ previous unfavorable judicial decisions
  • “[N]aming the D.C. courts, and their components, as defendants does not save plaintiffs’ claims because those entities are non sui juris.”
  • “[N]aming the D.C. courts, and their components, as defendants does not save plaintiffs’ claims because those entities are non sui juris.”
  • “[P]ro se plaintiffs are not required to use specific legal terms or phrases[.]”
  • “pro se plaintiffs are not required to use specific legal terms or phrases”
  • “[A] failure to get one’s desired decisions in our local courts does not constitute such ‘unavailability.’” (citing Roth v. King, 449 F.3d 1272, 1286-87 (D.C. Cir. 2006)), aff’d, 344 F. App’x 620 (D.C. Cir. 2009

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richard J. Leon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.